The Earth's climate over the last ~10,000 years has been an 'abnormally' STABLE period relative to the more commonly unstable climate patterns recorded in the long term paleoclimatic data. Large scale agriculture, as we know it and opon which we have grown to depend, HAS only and COULD only exist within such an 'abnormally stable' climatic period like we have experienced over the past 10,000 years. While it then behooves us as a collective to address any potential impacts that we MAY have on this fragile climate system for which we rely, it ultimately does not matter if we can simply change our 'energy paradigm' to one that is more EMPOWERING.
"Changing the Climate of Collective Empowerment"
(recorded Oct 24, 2012)
While I did not include any information regarding persistent contrails, weather modification or geoengineering in this video above, if we also DO include these very important man-made geoengineering and weather modification considerations within the discussion it only further enhances the message of what I present here regarding our collective approach to the observed climate change issue. Also note that this video was recorded just days before Hurricane Sandy devastated the northeastern US. It was the weather modification of Hurricane Sandy that woke me up to the ongoing realities of weather modification and the potential realities of geoengineering experimentation in our atmosphere.
****************************
Sustainable energy management is something that we create from the inside-out. We can never achieve sustainable energy in the outer world until we deal with the demons that disrupt the flow of our own internal energy. This means getting in touch with the the deep hidden fears that we ALL harbor regarding the loss of our 'freedom' (right wing) as well as the loss of our 'protection' (left wing).
Both the 'left wing' and 'right wing' factions
of politics share these wounds in common and this forms a roadblock to our own personal freedom and protection that can only be achieved outwardly through the achievement of a state of 'sovereign harmony' within. This state of internal sustainable
energy management creates ripples that can eventually lead to
collective sustainable energy management in the outer world.
When the current financial system unravels, it will open the door to existing 'free energy' technologies that will provide us all with a 'zero climate-impact' opportunity for energy use along with ever more freedom.
It is not the energy that we burn in order to live that is the problem, but the energy of ourselves that we give away which keeps us in a state of confused dis-empowerment and perceived disagreement.
Let'sallow the flow of power BACK into our hands...and lets do ittogether rather than divided! Sovereign Harmony
-POTENTIAL GEO-ENGINEERING TO COMBAT CLIMATE CHANGE- The following links build on the media 'narrative' that climate change is both
dangerously eminent and definitely leads to 'warming' primarily due to human-enhanced greenhouse
emissions. Proposals for
geo-engineering the climate would ONLY be warranted under these 'assumptions'. In my opinion, it is these assumptions that need to be revisited in order to properly address the scope of the observations of our changing weather and climate. The effects of persistent contrails combined with other man-made weather modification activities are NOT adequately included within current computer model projections for climate change. In my opinion, we cannot make plans for a future based on erroneous assumptions and flawed computer models that currently exclude important variables.
-ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS FOR OBSERVED WEATHER EXTREMES & GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE-
"How much of global warming or climate change is actually by billions of tons of these aerosols that have been sprayed over us for the last 8 years without our permission? It's not just CO2 conditions that we have to deal with but we have to deal with weather modification. How is weather modifcation by the military destabilizing our planet's natural weather?" - Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri (from the MA School of Law Global Climate Change conference just below)
- LOOKING FORWARD TO A FUTURE USING ZERO CLIMATE-IMPACT FREE ENERGY-
"We keep inventing jobs because of this false idea that everybody has to be employed at some kind of drudgery because, according to Malthusian-Darwinian theory, he must justify his right to exist. So we have inspectors of inspectors and people making instruments for inspectors to inspect inspectors." - Richard Buckminster Fuller
I suspect that 'stratospheric aerosol geoengineering' (SAG)
and/or 'solar radiation management' (SRM) programs using
airplane-deployed spraying technologies are already underway. A common 'narrative' as to WHY spraying these
trails containing oxides of aluminum, barium and strontium into the
atmosphere may be beneficial is that these particulates may serve as a
method of reflecting sunlight and combating 'global warming'. As someone
with a strong educational and professional background in this science
and based on some suspicious activities (see below), I am personally
skeptical of this 'accepted narrative' as to why this spraying would be
occurring. I also suspect, based one my research and observations and
despite the 'official' reference specifically to 'stratospheric'
spraying, that little (if any) of the current spraying activities are
actually occurring 'well' within the stratosphere. In my opinion, the
spraying activities appear to be more related to weather modification
activities within the 'troposphere' rather than to 'global warming'
prevention projects to reflect sunlight within the higher reaches of the
stratosphere (see article and video links just below).
All 'weather' as we know it occurs within the lowest level of the
atmosphere known as the 'troposphere'. The boundary between the upper
troposphere and the lower stratosphere (i.e. the tropopause) is where
commercial airplanes fly (~30-35K feet) and its the highest level for
the tops of even the largest cumulonimbus clouds associated with
thunderstorms, hurricanes and general weather activities (non-weather
related clouds DO exist at higher altitudes than this). So, strictly for the intention
of weather modification, spraying particles well into the stratosphere
would NOT make any sense. Cloud-seeding activities using chemical
compounds such as silver iodide have been used for decades as a way to
increase condensation nuclei and encourage precipitation to fall to the
ground within the troposphere (typically sprayed between 16-22K feet into existing clouds). However, its only recently that weather
modification operations using potentially more toxic oxides of elements
such as aluminum have been potentially occurring.
The upper portion of the troposphere is also where natural cirrus
clouds exist and its why this would be an ideal location to physically
'blend' the backdrop of the atmospheric landscape with 'trailing
activities' in a way in which the average person would be unsuspecting
(if this were the intention). Due to the thermodynamic conditions above
what is known as the 'tropopause' (i.e. the invisible boundary between
the troposphere and the stratosphere) particles well within the
stratosphere take MUCH longer to fall to the ground and get 'trapped'
temporarily within the stratosphere before gradually trickling into the
troposphere and eventually making their way onto the ground. Hence, this
is why spraying well up into the stratosphere wouldn't make any sense if
'weather modification' has been the actual intention thus far. This is
also why, for example, when Mt. Pinatubo erupted in 1991, the global temperature
cooled significantly over the course of the 1992 calendar year and this
was due to the natural sulfur emissions from the eruption that were
ejected well into the 'stratosphere' allowing the particles to linger
and reflect more sunlight than usual over that period.
This fact and the observations of the effects of stratospheric
particulates are part of the reasoning behind the geoengineering 'proposals' for
artificially injecting sulfur well into the stratosphere to reflect
sunlight and 'cool' the planet as a way to theoretically reduce 'global
warming'. Assuming 'warming' is the ONLY concern with regards to climate change, then theoretically, this process most certainly should work
successfully to 'cool' the planet. But, the potential human health/environmental effects of
such potential geoengineering activities are another matter. And,
injecting aluminum, barium and strontium (or any other particles) into
the upper 'troposphere' or lower portions of the stratosphere (i.e.
where commercial airplanes typically achieve their cruising altitudes)
allows for relatively rapid precipitation of these particles to the
ground (compared to particles injected well into the stratosphere) due
to gravity and due to the typical thermodynamic conditions that exist
within the troposphere under normal conditions. While artificial sulfur
injections well into the stratosphere may be a 'potential'
geoengineering proposal, artificial upper tropospheric/lower
stratospheric injections of aluminum, barium and strontium oxides appear
to be currently occurring and they appear to have been occurring
without properly informing the public and without conducting adequate
research into the potential human health/environmental effects of
spraying these compounds into our environment.
- "Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base" - National Academy of Sciences - 1992 - Conclusions from the 1992 National Academy of Sciences publication above:
"...the N.A.S. [National Academy of Sciences] found that the most
effective global warming mitigation turned out to be the spraying of
reflective aerosol compounds into the atmosphere utilizing commercial,
military and private aircraft. This preferred mitigation method is
designed to create a global atmospheric shield which would increase the
planet's albedo (reflectivity) using aerosol compounds of aluminum and barium oxides, and to introduce ozone generating chemicals into the atmosphere." - http://www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/smoking_gun.html
I personally find it slightly suspicious that this 1991
patent for a technology to spray aluminum oxides was completed BEFORE
the above official study came out in 1992 on global warming mitigation
policies which essentially concludes that aluminum oxides would be ideal
aerosol compounds with which to spray. Also, note that this is just ONE of many related patents potentially associated with these spraying activities.
**************** David Keith is a professor of public policy and applied physics at
Harvard University who was quoted in the Oct 25 article below that was published just 2 weeks after a Swedish official admitted
to their own SAG and/or SRM programs AND just 2 days after an article was published on the
potential health dangers and other risks of such global scale projects
(see below). Also note that these articles were leading up to
'Frankenstorm Sandy' just a few days later for which there was clear
indication of aerosol modification on satellite imagery. However, it is
unclear exactly as to the underlying intentions for these specific
modification activities (i.e. was it to influence the storm's direction
and/or strength? and in what ways)?. See video and article just below
for more details on modification of Hurricane Sandy and modification of tropical weather, in general.
"Geoengineering—using technology to purposefully change the
climate—is the only option for reducing the risk of climate change from
greenhouse-gas emissions in the next few decades" - David Keith
Quotes from the video in the lecture link just above:
"The little picture is from a nanofabrication study which shows
you can make very high quality...and do this in just a jet in a very
simple way. Make high quality alumina particles just by spraying alumina
vapor out in chunks of ice. So its certainly, in principle, possible to
do that. There's a big literature that's already looked at that. And
you can do that either by building new versions of these aircraft or
even re-engineering existing aircraft. So there's some ideas about...if
you go to an engineering firm and you want this done, they don't say
this is hard or unusual. They say, 'okay yes, we can do it. " - David Keith
"The alumina, we've only begun to research and published nothing.
We haven't done anything serious on alumina and so there could be
something terrible that we'll find tomorrow that we haven't looked at." - David Keith
"And by the way, its not really a moral hazard, its more like free-riding on our grand-kids." - David Keith
****************
David Keith is also filmed in the documentary "What in the World Are
They Spraying" (see link below) speaking at the American Association for
the Advancement of Science (AAAS) conference in Feb 2010 in San Diego,
CA where he talks openly about spraying 'potentially' toxic aluminum
oxide as part of these operations YET in the Oct 25th article above he
mentions ONLY the 'potential' spraying of more naturally occurring
sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere. Why does he fail to mention the
'potential' for using aluminum to reflect more sunlight than sulfur for
reducing 'global warming' in the above article in the same way that he
does at the AAAS conference just 2-1/2 years prior? This information
regarding spraying aluminum and other more potentially toxic oxides was
certainly covered in the National Academy of Sciences 1992 publication
(see link above). I find it suspicious that the Oct 25 article quoting
David Keith speaks ONLY of the potential use of sulfur compounds despite
his obvious knowledge of the use of aluminum, barium and strontium
oxides. Its interesting to note that the Oct 23 article above, which
discusses the potential dangers of spraying, also only speaks of using
sulfur as part of the solution.
*Note that aluminum most certainly has cumulative toxic effects in humans. See articles just below for more details:
Final Thoughts While I did not include any information regarding geo-engineering or weather modification in this video below, if we also DO include these very important geo-engineering and weather modification considerations within the discussion it only further enhances the message of what I present here regarding our collective approach to the climate change issue(see blog link below).
Also note that this was recorded just days before Hurricane Sandy devastated the northeastern US. It was the weather modification of Hurricane Sandy that woke me up to the ongoing realities of geo-engineering activities in our atmosphere.
-Christopher Robert Taylor
Educational Background BS - Meteorology - Plymouth State University (2001) MS - Atmospheric Science - University of California, Davis (2003) MESM - Environmental Science & Management - University of California, Santa Barbara (2005)